Linters catch syntax. Your CI catches tests. But who catches architectural violations, cross-service breaking changes, and security vulnerabilities that span repos? Probe does.
Free and open source. Business and Enterprise plans available.
Reviews understand your entire system, not just the diff. Catches breaking changes across services that traditional reviews miss.
Automated scanning for OWASP vulnerabilities, exposed secrets, and insecure patterns. Catch security issues before they reach production.
Every PR reviewed against the same standards. No more quality variance based on who's available or how busy the team is.
First-pass review happens instantly. Human reviewers focus on business logic and design, not hunting for issues.
Not every reviewer has the context. Not every PR gets the scrutiny it deserves. And the issues that slip through become production incidents.
Reviewers see a 200-line PR. They spot a few style issues, approve, and move on. They don't realize this change breaks an API contract that three other services depend on. The blast radius isn't visible in the diff. It only becomes clear when production breaks.
Your linters catch syntax. Your tests catch regressions. But who catches the architectural violations? The security vulnerabilities hidden in dependencies? The performance anti-patterns that won't show up until scale hits? These slip through because no single reviewer has the full picture.
Your senior engineer catches issues junior reviewers miss. But your senior is overloaded, so most PRs get junior reviews. Quality drifts. Six months later, you're dealing with technical debt that could have been caught at code review time — when it was cheap to fix.
Real checks teams run on every PR. Security scanning, architectural validation, cross-service impact analysis, and compliance enforcement.
Reviews that understand your entire system, not just the diff. Catch issues that span repos, services, and dependencies.
Traditional code review tools see diffs in isolation. Probe understands call graphs, service dependencies, API contracts, and shared interfaces. It knows when a change in one service breaks consumers in another repo. It catches architectural violations that no single file diff could reveal.
Know what breaks when you change something, before you merge. Map dependencies across your entire architecture.
Most breaking changes aren't caught by tests. They're caught in production, when a dependent service starts failing. By then, you're debugging an incident instead of fixing a PR.
Probe maps your service dependencies, API contracts, and shared libraries. When a PR modifies a public interface, it flags every consumer that will be affected. When you deprecate a method, it shows you everywhere it's still called. It turns "did I break anything?" from a hope into a fact.
Define standards once, enforce them everywhere. Different rules per repo, per team, per client.
Every team has standards. Some are documented. Most live in senior engineers' heads. New people don't know them. Busy reviewers forget to check them. Technical debt accumulates because the guardrails aren't automated.
Probe lets you codify your standards. Define rules per repo, per language, per team. Agency working with multiple clients? Different rules per client. Platform team supporting app teams? Different rules per service tier. The rules evolve with your codebase, versioned alongside the code.
Pre-built workflows for security, quality, compliance, and more. Deploy in minutes, customize to your needs, improve over time.
Every PR gets a comprehensive first-pass review the moment it opens. Security scan, architecture check, test coverage analysis, and style consistency. Human reviewers see a pre-reviewed PR with issues already flagged.
Define a set of non-negotiable checks that must pass before merge. Security issues block automatically. Missing tests for high-risk code block. Breaking changes without migration plan block. No exceptions.
Weekly audit of all merged code. Check for patterns that slipped through, accumulating technical debt, drift from standards, and areas where test coverage is declining. Early warning system for quality erosion.
Scheduled security scans across the entire codebase. Check for newly disclosed CVEs in dependencies, OWASP vulnerabilities that may have been introduced, exposed secrets, and insecure configurations. Report posted to security channel.
Runs entirely in your infrastructure. Your code never leaves your network. Full data sovereignty and compliance with SOC 2, HIPAA, and regulatory requirements.
Use your preferred model -- Claude, GPT, open-source, or self-hosted. No vendor lock-in. Switch models without changing workflows or losing review quality.
OpenTelemetry instrumentation captures every review, every check, every decision. Complete traceability for compliance audits and security investigations.
The core review engine is open source and auditable. Your security team can inspect how reviews work and verify no code is sent to external systems.
Start with the open-source core for single-repo review. Scale to enterprise when you need cross-repo analysis and workflow automation.
Free forever
The core review engine. Perfect for evaluating the technology on a single repository or for individual developers reviewing their own code.
Contact for pricing
Everything in Open Source, plus cross-repo analysis, architecture awareness, custom review rules, and workflow automation.
Recommended approach: validate the core technology with open source on a single PR, then pilot the enterprise features on a real project.
Get automated code review running on a real PR before your next meeting. No account required.
Add a GitHub Action to your repo. Every PR automatically gets a first-pass review: security scan, breaking change detection, test coverage analysis. Fully customizable per project.
Add Probe to Claude Code or Cursor. Get architecture-aware code review directly in your editor. Ask questions about the review, drill into specific issues, understand the full context.
Run a one-time security audit on your entire repository. Scan for OWASP vulnerabilities, exposed secrets, insecure patterns, and known CVEs. Get a detailed report with remediation steps.
Once you've validated the core technology, run a pilot on a real project to test cross-repo analysis, custom review rules, and workflow automation.
Choose a project with multiple repositories, active development, and where code review quality matters. Ideally a project where you've had production incidents from code review gaps.
We'll work with your team to map service dependencies, define API contracts, and configure cross-repo analysis. This sets up the foundation for architecture-aware reviews.
Codify your team's review standards. Security requirements, architectural patterns, testing expectations, performance guidelines. These rules will be enforced on every PR.
Track issues caught before merge vs. after, time saved in human review, and reduction in review-related production incidents. Compare to your baseline before Probe.
Want to discuss how a pilot would work for your team?
Schedule a Technical DiscussionCopilot suggests code. Linters check style. Neither understands your architecture. They don't know that this change breaks an API contract, or that this pattern violates your team's standards, or that three other services depend on the interface you're modifying.
Probe understands your entire system -- dependencies, contracts, patterns, and historical decisions. It reviews code the way a senior engineer would, with full context.
No. It replaces the first pass -- the mechanical checking for security issues, missing tests, style violations, and obvious bugs. Human reviewers focus on what they're good at: design decisions, business logic, and architectural trade-offs. Not hunting for missing error checks.
Yes, extensively. Define rules per repo, per team, per language. Different standards for core services vs. experiments. Agency working with multiple clients? Different rules per client. Rules live as code, versioned alongside your codebase, updated through PRs.
Every automated review system has false positives. Probe minimizes them by understanding context -- it knows the difference between a security vulnerability and a safe pattern. When it does flag something incorrectly, you can tune the rule or suppress that check. Over time, your review quality improves as the rules learn from your feedback.
Let's talk about how Probe can improve your code review process. We'll show you how it works on a real PR from your codebase and discuss how to structure a pilot.